- Catherine
- August 26, 2023
- 3:31 am
Subnet manager of switch, subnet manager of OFED, UFM, is there any difference in the number of management nodes of them? Which one is more suitable for clients to choose when deploying?
Harry Collins
Answered on 3:31 am
The switch subnet manager, the OFED subnet manager, and UFM are software that are used to initialize and manage switches and hosts in the InfiniBand network. Their main difference lies in where they run and the scope of their functions.
The switch subnet manager is software that runs on the switch itself. It can automatically discover and configure devices in the network and provide basic network monitoring and diagnostic functions. It does not require additional management nodes, but it also does not support advanced network optimization and security functions.
The OFED subnet manager is software that runs on the host. It can use the subnet management service provided by OpenSM or Mellanox OFED. It can run on multiple hosts, achieving subnet manager redundancy and load balancing. It supports some advanced network functions, such as adaptive routing and congestion control, but it also does not support network security and preventive maintenance functions.
UFM is software that runs on dedicated management nodes. It is NVIDIA’s unified network management platform. It can monitor and manage the InfiniBand network comprehensively, supporting various advanced network functions, such as adaptive routing, congestion control, network security, preventive maintenance, performance analysis, etc. It requires at least one management node and a UFM license.
Which one is more suitable for customers to choose depends on their needs and budgets. If customers only need basic network functions and do not want to add extra management nodes, they can choose the switch subnet manager. If customers need some advanced network functions and already have host nodes, they can choose the OFED subnet manager. If customers need the most comprehensive and advanced network functions and are willing to invest in dedicated management nodes and UFM licenses, they can choose UFM.
People Also Ask
Related Articles
800G SR8 and 400G SR4 Optical Transceiver Modules Compatibility and Interconnection Test Report
Version Change Log Writer V0 Sample Test Cassie Test Purpose Test Objects：800G OSFP SR8/400G OSFP SR4/400G Q112 SR4. By conducting corresponding tests, the test parameters meet the relevant industry standards,
How NVIDIA GB200 Utilizes 800G/1.6T DAC/ACC
NVIDIA has released the latest GB200 series compute systems, with significantly improved performance. These systems utilize both copper and optical interconnects, leading to much discussion in the market about the
NVIDIA GB200 Analysis: Interconnect Architecture and Future Evolution
GB200 Interconnect Architecture Analysis NVLink Bandwidth Calculation NVIDIA has a lot of confusion in the calculation of NVLink transmission bandwidth and the concepts of SubLink/Port/Lane. Typically, the NVLink bandwidth of
Market Forecast for AEC, DAC, and AOC
According to a recent report from Lightcounting, the market for Active Electrical Cables (AEC), Digital-to-Analog Converters (DAC), and Active Optical Cables (AOC) is expected to grow from $1.2 billion in
The Accelerating AI Industry Drives Demand for 1.6T OSFP-XD
The demand for AI hardware is booming, and the shipment of computing chips is expected to accelerate. Based on FiberMall’s research on the computing power industry chain, FiberMall forecasts that
The Differences Between MPO and MTP
In the rapidly evolving field of communications, fiber optic patch cables play a crucial role in data transmission. However, many people may misjudge the selection between MPO and MTP fiber
What is the Differences Between CPO and LPO
Traditional optical modules are independent of the switching ASIC and connected to other electronic components through copper cables or optical fibers. This approach often leads to significant power consumption and