QSFP-DD vs OSFP vs QSFP56 vs QSFP112: Advantages and Challenges

5G, the Internet of Things (IoT), and growing video-based data transport place heavy pressure on carriers and data centers to upgrade their network capacity to support these data-intensive applications. In addition, recent behavioral changes brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, such as remote working, remote learning, and increased streaming for entertainment, will continue well after this health crisis ends. As the explosion in the capacity demands of data-hungry applications outpaces current high-speed transport abilities, 400G is a promising new technology that supports an immediate need in fiber optics with comparatively low operational expenses (OPEX) and a smaller footprint.

The demand for high-speed networking has skyrocketed with the rise of 5G, cloud computing, and data-intensive applications like AI and IoT. 400G optical transceivers, such as QSFP-DD, OSFP, and QSFP56, are at the forefront of this evolution, offering unparalleled bandwidth and efficiency for data centers and telecommunications. In this guide, we’ll compare QSFP-DD, OSFP, and QSFP56, exploring their advantages, challenges, and applications to help you choose the right form factor for your network infrastructure.

Overview of QSFP-DD, OSFP, QSFP56, and QSFP112

QSFP-DD (Quad Small Form Factor Pluggable Double Density)

QSFP-DD, also known as QSFP56-DD, is an evolution of the QSFP form factor designed to support 200G, 400G, and even 800G Ethernet. It doubles the number of electrical lanes from four to eight compared to QSFP28, achieving higher bandwidth through either NRZ (25 Gb/s per lane for 200G) or PAM4 modulation (50 Gb/s per lane for 400G, 100 Gb/s per lane for 800G). Its compact size and backward compatibility with earlier QSFP modules make it a popular choice for data centers.

OSFP (Octal Small Form Factor Pluggable)

OSFP is a newer form factor designed specifically for 400G and 800G applications, with eight electrical lanes supporting up to 100 Gb/s each (using PAM4). It is slightly larger than QSFP-DD, offering enhanced thermal management and future scalability. OSFP is not backward compatible with QSFP modules but is optimized for high-performance applications like telecommunications and AI-driven networking.

QSFP56

QSFP56 is designed for 200G Ethernet, utilizing four lanes at 50 Gb/s each with PAM4 modulation. It shares the same physical dimensions as QSFP+ and QSFP28, ensuring compatibility with existing QSFP ports. QSFP56 is an intermediate step between 100G and 400G, making it suitable for networks not yet ready for 400G upgrades.

QSFP112

QSFP112 is an advanced version of the QSFP form factor, supporting 400G by using four lanes at 112 Gb/s each with PAM4 modulation. It retains the same physical size as QSFP28 and QSFP56, offering a seamless upgrade path for legacy QSFP users transitioning to 400G. QSFP112 is particularly energy-efficient and suited for high-performance computing (HPC) and telecommunications.

400G QSFP-DD Based on PAM4 Modulation

PAM4 is the main modulation method of 400G QSFP-DD, and there are two types：multi-mode and single-mode. The 400G QSFP-DD based on PAM4 modulation uses 8x50G PAM4 modulation on the electrical port side, and 8x50G PAM4 and 4x100G PAM4 modulation types on the optical port side.

Figure1: 400G QSFP-DD based on PAM4 modulation

Multi-mode 400G QSFP-DD

400G multi-mode QSFP-DD has SR8 and SR4.2 interfaces, both of which use 8x50G PAM4 modulation.

SR8: “SR” refers to the use of multimode fiber to transmit a distance of 100m, and “8” indicates that there are 8 optical channels. A total of 16 fibers (8 Tx and 8 Rx) are required for each optical channel operating at 50G PAM4. The SR8 module uses MPO-16 connectors or MPO-24 connectors to connect 8 pairs of fibers.

Figure2: MPO-16 connector and MPO-24 connector

SR4.2: “SR” refers to the use of multimode fiber to transmit a distance of 100m, “4” indicates that there are four optical channels, and “2” indicates that each channel uses two wavelengths. Each optical channel operates at 2x50G PAM4, requiring a total of 8 fibers, and the wavelengths are bidirectional and multiplexed. SR4.2 modules use MPO-12 connectors, and the main advantage of SR4.2 is that it can continue to use existing installed fiber resources.

Figure3: MPO-12 BiDi

Each fiber of SR4.2 in the MPO-12 connector carries 2x50G bidirectional PAM4 signals. SR4.2 also supports MDC and SN connector interfaces.

PMD	Transmission distance	Fiber Type	Optical port	Number of fiber cores	Wavelength	Method of modulation
SR8	100m	Parallel multimode	MPO- 16(APC)or MPO- 24(PC)	16	850nm	50G PAM4
SR4.2	100m	Parallel multimode	MPO- 12(APC)	8	850nm/910nm	50G PAM4

Table1: 400G mluti-mode QSFP-DD

Single-mode 400G QSFP-DD

Single-mode 400G QSFP-DD can be divided into two groups. One group of optical ports is modulated with 8x50G PAM4, and the other group is modulated with 4x100G PAM4. Both methods use the DSP as a CDR (no analog CDR is built) or use a combination of Gearbox and CDR. The difference is the signaling rate on the line side and the number of lasers used.

Figure4: Two groups of single-mode 400G QSFP-DD

Single-mode QSFP-DD Based on 8×50G PAM4

There are three general types: FR8, LR8, and 2xFR4. FR8 and LR8 are the earliest available 400G single-mode interfaces. “8” means 8 wavelengths, and each runs at 50G PAM4. “FR” means 2km transmission, and “LR” means 10km transmission. 8 wavelengths are multiplexed into one fiber. FR8 and LR8QSFP-DD use duplex LC optical interfaces.

Figure 5: Single-mode QSFP-DD based on 8×50G PAM4

The 2xFR4 QSFP-DD uses 8 lasers, but in two groups of 4 wavelengths (following the 200G FR4 standard). The two sets are multiplexed into the fiber separately, and the QSFP-DD provides 2x200G signals on 2 CS connectors.

PMD	Transmission distance	Fiber Type	Optical port	Number of fiber cores	Wavelength	Method of modulation
2xFR4	2km	SMF	2xCS	4	4(CWDM4)	50G PAM4
FR8	2km	SMF	LC	2	8(LWDM)	50G PAM4
LR8	10km	SMF	LC	2	8(LWDM)	50G PAM4

Table2: single-mode optical transceiver based on 8×50G PAM4

However, there are trade-offs when using an 8x50G solution. On the one hand, they offer improved link budgets in some cases, but on the other hand, the total laser costs per module are higher and the optical packaging is more complex, resulting in lower yields and higher production costs. In contrast, 4x100G modules have lower power consumption and simpler thermal processing capabilities, so devices are gradually shifting to 4x100G solutions.

Single-mode Optical Module Based on 4x100G PAM4

4x100G QSFP-DD optical modules are the current market focus, and the most common part is the use of 4 lanes with 100G PAM4 on the line side. Here, we can classify optical modules into two types: multi-fiber and dual-fiber. The key elements in these optical modules are Gearbox-enabled DSPs, including DR4, FR4, and LR4.

In the DR4 optical module, the DSP converts the 8x50G PAM4 electrical signal to 4x100G PAM4 and transmits it to the optical engine. At the same time, the DSP acts as a CDR. In DR4, each channel operates at 1310nm and requires one fiber, so a total of 8 fibers are required.

Figure6: Single-mode optical module based on 4x100G PAM4

The basic functions of FR4 and LR4 DSPs are the same as those in DR4. But now 4 wavelengths (CWDM4) are used instead of four 1310nm signals and a multiplexer is added to combine these CWDM signals. In this way, the number of optical fibers required is reduced to 2 (TX+RX), and a duplex LC optical port is used.

Figure7: Single-mode 4x100G FR4

For LR4, there are two different routes, and we will most likely end up with two versions. One for 6km (IEEE) and one for 10km (100G lambda MSA).

PMD	Transmission distance	Fiber Type	Optical port	Number of fiber cores	Wavelength	Method of modulation
DR4	500m	PSM/SMF	MPO-12(APC)	8	1(1310nm)	100G PAM4
FR4	2km	SMF	LC	2	4(CWDM4)	100G PAM4
LR4	10km	SMF	LC	2	4(CWDM4)	100G PAM4

Table3: Single-mode optical module based on 4×100G PAM4

In the future, considering the costs, 400G transmission with 4-way optical signals may become mainstream. At the same time, the electrical port of the optical module may also be gradually upgraded to the form of 4×100G PAM4 to save the Gearbox chip and save power consumption and cost.

QSFP-DD vs QSFP (QSFP+/QSFP28)

The new QSFP-DD interface expands on the QSFP pluggable form factor, a widely adopted four-lane electrical interface used across Ethernet switches that enables interconnection between switches or to servers. QSFP’s four electrical lanes operate at 10Gb/s or 25Gb/s, providing solutions for 40Gb/s or 100Gb/s aggregate. The 400G QSFP-DD pluggable form factor’s electrical interfaces employ eight lanes that operate up to 25Gb/s NRZ modulation or 50Gb/s PAM4 modulation, providing solutions up to 200Gb/s or 400Gb/s aggregate. This can enable up to 14.4Tb/s aggregate bandwidth in a single switch slot and address rapid data center traffic growth.

The system port densities are identical between QSFP-DD and QSFP28 module specifications. However, since each QSFP-DD port can accommodate 8 lanes instead of 4, QSFP-DD doubles the number of ASIC ports it supports for existing interfaces such as CAUI-4. QSPF-DD provides the highest BW density of any pluggable module.

The BW density of QSFP-DD

Systems designed with QSFP-DD modules are backward compatible, allowing them to support existing QSFP modules and provide flexibility for end users and system designers. Backward compatibility is critically important to the industry. The economy of scale achieved due to backward compatibility makes it highly desirable.

In summary, 400G QSFP-DD is a little longer than QSFP+/QSFP28 but the port density is the same, and the bandwidth is increased to 10 times or 4 times the latter, and it is backward compatible, which means customers can skip the QSFP system and directly deploys the QSFP-DD system, which greatly reduces the equipment costs.

QSFP-DD vs OSFP

First, let’s take a look at OSFP transceiver. The 400G OSFP is a new pluggable form factor with eight high-speed electrical lanes that will initially support 400Gb/s (8x50G). It is slightly wider and deeper than the QSFP but it still supports 36 OSFP ports per 1U front panel, enabling 14.4Tb/s per 1U. Actually, there is not much difference between these two form factors. For example, let’s compare QSFP-DD DR4 with OSFP DR4. The OSFP DR4 is a 400Gb/s Octal Small Form-factor Pluggable (OSFP) optical module designed for 500m optical communication applications. The module incorporates 4 parallel channels on 1310nm center wavelength, operating at 100G per channel. The transmitter path incorporates a quad-channel EML driver together with 4 parallel EMLs. While the QSFP-DD DR4 also supports a max transmission distance of 500 meters on 1310nm center wavelength. But the different part is that the QSFP-DD DR4 module converts 8 channels of 50Gb/s (PAM4) electrical signal into 4 channels of parallel optical output data, each capable of 100Gb/s data rate for an aggregated bandwidth of 400Gbls. 

Second, about the thermal capacity and power consumption. The QSFP-DD is smaller in size, so its thermal capacity is only 7 to 12 watts. While the OSFP transceiver is larger in size, its thermal capacity can reach 12 to 15 watts. The larger the thermal capacity, the greater the power consumption that the optical module can withstand.

Thirdly, the 400G OSFP’s larger size, integrated heatsink, and single-row contacts were initially considered better. Signal integrity through the connector and thermal cooling challenges were the prime focus areas. However, QSFP-DD’s backward compatibility to lower speed QSFP28 proved to be a market success once technical concerns were allayed.

QSFP-DD vs CFP8

The CFP series started from CFP, went to CFP2, then to CFP4, and finally to CFP8, which is also a long-established form-factor series. Compared to the QSFP series, the CFP series seems to have been less popular, for obvious reasons — large size and high power consumption.

Compared to QSFP-DD and CFP8, the first obvious thing is the size — the size of CFP8 (41.5mm*107.5mm*9.5mm) is significantly larger than QSFP-DD, and the volume is more than three times that of QSFP-DD.

Besides, for backward compatibility, there is not any mention of backward compatibility in the hardware specification of CFP8 (in fact, the entire CFP series does not seem to be backward compatible). For CFP and CFP2 series optical modules, the CFP to QSFP28 adapter and CFP2 to QSFP28 adapter have been available for a long time, indicating that some users have switched to QSFP28 optical modules.

Then the maximum bandwidth of CFP8 and QSFP-DD is 400Gb/s, but CFP8 only supports 400Gb/s (16x25G or 8x50G), while QSFP-DD supports both 200Gb/s (8x25G) and 400Gb/s (8x50G). In summary, QSFP-DD seems to be a better choice than CFP8, regardless of any aspect.

QSFP-DD vs QSFP56

As an evolution of the previous 40G QSFP+ and 100G QSFP28, Quad 50 Gigabits Small Form-factor Pluggable (QSFP56) is the one designed for 200G Ethernet. QSFP56 denotes 4 x 50 to 56Gb/s in a QSFP form factor. Sometimes it can also be referred to as 200G QSFP for the sake of simplicity. QSFP56 optical modules are similar to QSFP ones in terms of size and form factor. Generally, two QSFP56 modules can be used with an SMF or MMF to realize a 200G link. 

The latest iteration of the optical module form factor is from QSFP56 to QSFP56-DD, which is also called 400G QSFP-DD. Though QSFP56-DD has double the density, its size is similar to QSFP56. 400G QSFP56-DD port is backward compatible with the QSFP transceiver, which means that as long as the switch supports, QSFP56 can work on the QSFP56-DD port. When using a QSFP56 module in a QSFP56-DD port, this port will be configured for a data rate of 200G, instead of 400G.

QSFP-DD vs QSFP112

QSFP-DD (Quad Small Form Factor Pluggable Double Density) and QSFP112 are advanced QSFP-based transceivers designed for high-speed networking, primarily targeting 400G Ethernet, but they differ in lane configuration, scalability, and application focus. Below is a concise comparison of their advantages and challenges to guide network operators in selecting the optimal form factor.

QSFP-DD: Advantages and Challenges

• Advantages:
  • Scalability: Supports 200G, 400G, and up to 800G with eight lanes (25 Gb/s NRZ for 200G, 50 Gb/s PAM4 for 400G, 100 Gb/s PAM4 for 800G), making it ideal for future-proofing large-scale networks.
  • Backward Compatibility: Compatible with QSFP+, QSFP28, and QSFP56, enabling seamless integration into existing QSFP infrastructure, reducing upgrade costs.
  • High Port Density: Its compact size (18.35mm x 89.4mm x 8.5mm) allows up to 36 400GbE ports in a 1U rack, delivering 14.4 Tb/s of bandwidth.
• Challenges:
  • Thermal Constraints: Limited to 7–12W power consumption, which may restrict performance in high-power or densely packed environments.
  • Cost: Typically 15–30% more expensive than QSFP112 due to its advanced design and broader scalability.
  • Integration Needs: Requires QSFP-DD-compatible switches/routers, potentially necessitating hardware upgrades.

QSFP112: Advantages and Challenges

• Advantages:
  • Energy Efficiency: Consumes 10–15W, with some modules up to 29% more efficient than other 400G transceivers, lowering operational costs.
  • Seamless 400G Transition: Uses four lanes at 112 Gb/s (PAM4), maintaining the QSFP form factor for easy upgrades in legacy QSFP systems (QSFP+, QSFP28, QSFP56).
  • Low-Latency Performance: Optimized for high-performance computing (HPC) and telecommunications requiring 400G with minimal latency.
• Challenges:
  • Limited Scalability: Focused on 400G, with no clear path to 800G, making it less future-proof than QSFP-DD.
  • Evolving Ecosystem: As a newer standard, QSFP112 has limited vendor support, potentially causing availability or compatibility issues.
  • Signal Complexity: PAM4 at 112 Gb/s increases signal integrity challenges, requiring advanced error correction.

400GbE’s Implementation Challenges

Higher speeds and the utilization of PAM4 modulation do bring great improvements in throughput, but also result in high complexity at the physical layer, and it causes signal transmission errors easily.

The first problem is, the higher lane speed in 400G electrical interfaces means more noise (also called signal-to-noise ratio) in signal transmission. And the high signal-to-noise ratio causes an increased bit error rate (BER), which in turn affects the signal quality.

Furthermore, on the physical appearance layer, for 400G optical modules, its high-speed interfaces include more electrical input interfaces, electrical output interfaces, optical input interfaces, optical output interfaces, and other power and low-speed management interfaces. All the performance of these interfaces should be made to a compliance of 400G standards. However, the size of the 400G transceivers is similar to the existing 100G transceivers; the integration of those interfaces needs more sophisticated manufacturing technology, as well as corresponding performance tests to ensure the quality of those modules.

At the same time, the complex of 400G transceiver test also brings new challenges for the optical module vendors. To ensure the transceiver quality for users, vendors have to attach great importance to the transceiver test equipment and R&D technical. How to make sure the new products support the 400G upgrade while dampening associated development and manufacturing test costs that can hamper competitive pricing models is what they should deal with.